Who Decides What Your Children See Online?
You… or the Government?
Section 230 keeps the Nanny State out of your home and protects the free-speech rights of every American family.
A Message from Chairman Rick Santorum
“A repeal of Section 230 would turn big tech into publishers… the progressive leadership of these big tech firms would then… REMOVE EVEN MORE conservative speech.”
The Fight for Parental Authority
For too long, big-government activists and trial lawyers have tried to use Big Tech’s bias as an excuse to seize control of the internet. They want to repeal Section 230, the legal bedrock that keeps the government from dictates what can and cannot be said online.
At Patriot Voices, we believe Parents Matter. We don’t need a “Board of Censors” in Washington, D.C. deciding what is appropriate for our families. We need the freedom to choose the platforms that align with our values.
4 Reasons Section 230 is a Win for Parents
1. Parents are the Ultimate Content Moderators
Repealing Section 230 would hand the power of censorship over to federal regulators and trial lawyers. Instead of you choosing the filters and platforms that work for your family, the government would create a one-size-fits-all “safety” standard that inevitably leans toward progressive ideology. We trust parents—not the Biden-Harris administration—to raise their children.
2. Protecting Conservative Alternatives
We are finally seeing the rise of family-friendly, conservative-led platforms. These alternatives rely on Section 230 to stay in business. Without it, a single wave of frivolous lawsuits from liberal trial lawyers could bankrupt the very sites that provide a safe space for conservative families to gather and organize.
3. Stopping the Woke Algorithm
If Section 230 is repealed, platforms will become legally liable for everything a user posts. To protect their bottom line, Big Tech will deploy even more aggressive, “woke” AI filters to scrub anything remotely controversial. This means religious content, traditional family values, and conservative political speech will be the first things deleted to “minimize risk.”
4. Defending Innovation and Choice
The best way to protect our kids is through more choice, not more regulation. Section 230 allows for a competitive market where new apps can develop better parental controls and unique community standards. When the government regulates, the big monopolies get stronger and the parents lose their seat at the table.
Read Rick Santorum’s column for The American Conservative
Senator Santorum penned an op-ed in The American Conservative on why Section 230 repeal is not the answer, encouraging conservatives to fight for free and fair online communities without resorting to tactics that only invite more censorship.
Read the op-ed
Join the Parents Matter Movement
Don’t let Washington bureaucrats become the “Super-Parents” of the internet. Stand with Patriot Voices to protect Section 230 and keep the power where it belongs: with you.
Press this button on your mobile phone to be connected to the U.S. Senate switchboard.
The Parents Matter Quick Guide
The Threat
Repealing Section 230 makes the internet look like the legacy media (ABC, NBC, CBS) — controlled by a handful of liberal editors and lawyers.
The Goal
A free and open internet where parents use tools, competition, and personal responsibility to guide their families.
The Bottom Line
Government regulation is never the solution to Big Tech bias; it’s a recipe for more censorship.