Larry DeMejo

commented on The Washington Post: For Santorum, the fight goes on 2013-11-08 17:45:09 -0500 · Flag
Dear Ethan,

I will answer your comment by quoting to you my answers 8 and 10 months ago to Brenda and Shirley who had similar comments as yours:

Larry DeMejo commented on A PUBLIC APOLOGY 8 months ago · Flag

Dear Brenda,

I am responding to your comment the same way I responded to Shirley’s comment to my earlier post and comment on this forum. You are sadly mistaken and misled. You had a realistic choice not to vote for Barak Obama or Mitt Romney in last November’s election, by voting for Tom Hoefling. Hoefling actually had a mathematical chance to win the presidential election (see http://www.tomhoefling.com/8/post/2012/10/411-electoral-votes-76-tom-hoefling-for-president-final-2012-presidential-ballot-access-list.html ).

Romney, by his own admission during the presidential campaign, supported killing of innocent children in cases of rape, incest or the mother’s health, and also as president would have left the legality of killing innocent children to be decided by the Supreme Court first and then to the individual states.

Do you hear yourself? Your statement to allow some babies to be killed to save others is heartless. You have no God given right nor legal justification, according to our Constitution, to deny the right to life of another guiltless human being. The death of even one innocent child should not be tolerated by you or anyone else in this country.

Romney, furthermore, as governor of Massachusetts, was instrumental in allowing the legalization of same sex marriage, for the first time ever, in one of the fifty states. Regardless of these known facts about Romney, you and Rick Santorum apparently chose to support and vote for Mitt Romney anyway. Your choice and Rick’s choice was your loss and sadly also our loss, as a nation.

When are you going to wake up and stop voting for compromised candidates like Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum? Are you looking for principles and candidates to ensure equal protection for all of us and our posterity? Please consider http://www.selfgovernment.us/platform.html

May the LORD Jesus Christ richly bless you as you choose to obey Him without compromise.

love,

larry

Larry DeMejo commented on TOM HOEFLING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2016 10 months ago · Flag

Dear Shirley, you are sadly mistaken and misled. This is the right site for me to post on because it does represent mainstream RNC. You had a realistic choice not to vote for Barak Obama or Mitt Romney in last November’s election, by voting for Tom Hoefling. Hoefling actually had a mathematical chance to win the presidential election (see http://www.tomhoefling.com/8/post/2012/10/411-electoral-votes-76-tom-hoefling-for-president-final-2012-presidential-ballot-access-list.html ). Romney, by his own admission during the presidential campaign, supported killing of innocent children in cases of rape, incest or the mother’s health, and also as president would have left the legality of killing innocent children to be decided by the Supreme Court first and then to the individual states. Romney, furthermore, as governor of Massachusetts, was instrumental in allowing the legalization of same sex marriage, for the first time ever, in one of the fifty states. Regardless of these known facts about Romney, you and Rick Santorum apparently chose to support and vote for Mitt Romney anyway. Your choice and Rick’s choice was your loss and sadly also our loss, as a nation.

When are you going to wake up and stop voting for compromised candidates like Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, who squarely represent the RNC? Are you looking for principles and candidates you are willing to tirelessly defend? Consider http://www.selfgovernment.us/platform.html

May the LORD Jesus Christ richly bless you as you choose to obey Him without compromise.

love,

larry

"180" - A Documentary About The Pro Choice Holocaust

Posted 2013-03-19 4:07 PM (#64981) By: SavedByGrace at

http://www.americaspartynews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=25376&posts=1#M64981

            ::

   Life, Liberty, Faith & the Family (Independent) -> The Equal Protection for Posterity Committee       

 

When it comes to destroying innocent human life can we compromise? Can we make exceptions? Can we make excuses?

http://www.180movie.com/

God says no!

Our conscience says no!

Our nation's federal and state Constitutions say no!

Any further objections?

 

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them. For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: because that, when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools…And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful” Romans 1:18-22, 28-31

To God alone be all the glory for every soul that repents and turns 180 degrees away from supporting, under any circumstance, this horrible slaughter!

-----

“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.” Ephesians 2:8-10


commented on A PUBLIC APOLOGY 2013-02-12 23:43:17 -0500 · Flag
Dear Brenda,

I am responding to your comment the same way I responded to Shirley’s comment to my earlier post and comment on this forum. You are sadly mistaken and misled. You had a realistic choice not to vote for Barak Obama or Mitt Romney in last November’s election, by voting for Tom Hoefling. Hoefling actually had a mathematical chance to win the presidential election (see http://www.tomhoefling.com/8/post/2012/10/411-electoral-votes-76-tom-hoefling-for-president-final-2012-presidential-ballot-access-list.html ).

Romney, by his own admission during the presidential campaign, supported killing of innocent children in cases of rape, incest or the mother’s health, and also as president would have left the legality of killing innocent children to be decided by the Supreme Court first and then to the individual states.

Do you hear yourself? Your statement to allow some babies to be killed to save others is heartless. You have no God given right nor legal justification, according to our Constitution, to deny the right to life of another guiltless human being. The death of even one innocent child should not be tolerated by you or anyone else in this country.

Romney, furthermore, as governor of Massachusetts, was instrumental in allowing the legalization of same sex marriage, for the first time ever, in one of the fifty states. Regardless of these known facts about Romney, you and Rick Santorum apparently chose to support and vote for Mitt Romney anyway. Your choice and Rick’s choice was your loss and sadly also our loss, as a nation.

When are you going to wake up and stop voting for compromised candidates like Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum? Are you looking for principles and candidates to ensure equal protection for all of us and our posterity? Please consider http://www.selfgovernment.us/platform.html

May the LORD Jesus Christ richly bless you as you choose to obey Him without compromise.

love,

larry

commented on TOM HOEFLING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2016 2012-12-15 07:31:45 -0500 · Flag
Dear Shirley, you are sadly mistaken and misled. This is the right site for me to post on because it does represent mainstream RNC. You had a realistic choice not to vote for Barak Obama or Mitt Romney in last November’s election, by voting for Tom Hoefling. Hoefling actually had a mathematical chance to win the presidential election (see http://www.tomhoefling.com/8/post/2012/10/411-electoral-votes-76-tom-hoefling-for-president-final-2012-presidential-ballot-access-list.html ). Romney, by his own admission during the presidential campaign, supported killing of innocent children in cases of rape, incest or the mother’s health, and also as president would have left the legality of killing innocent children to be decided by the Supreme Court first and then to the individual states. Romney, furthermore, as governor of Massachusetts, was instrumental in allowing the legalization of same sex marriage, for the first time ever, in one of the fifty states. Regardless of these known facts about Romney, you and Rick Santorum apparently chose to support and vote for Mitt Romney anyway. Your choice and Rick’s choice was your loss and sadly also our loss, as a nation. When are you going to wake up and stop voting for compromised candidates like Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, who squarely represent the RNC? Are you looking for principles and candidates you are willing to tirelessly defend? Consider http://www.selfgovernment.us/platform.html May the LORD Jesus Christ richly bless you as you choose to obey Him without compromise. love, larry

published Memorial for Unborn Children in Forum 2012-11-05 04:32:59 -0500

Memorial for Unborn Children

Picture
“Memorial for Unborn Children” - Sculptor: Martin Hudáček; born 1984; home: Banska Bystrica, Slovakia


love,

Larry



published Is Mitt Romney Pro Life? in Forum 2012-11-05 04:08:19 -0500

Is Mitt Romney Pro Life?

Mitt Romney has stated publicly that he is in favor of abortions in cases of rape, incest or to protect the mother's health.

What about God's unalienable right to life for the heartbeat living within that mother's womb?


Mitt Romney would not protect that living heartbeat in cases of rape, incest or to protect the mother's health.

Is Mitt Romney truly pro life or are he and the Republican Party deceiving pro life supporters by saying that
he is pro life to solicit their votes?

Please view Mitt Romney's other stated positions and intended courses of actions below on protecting innocent life in the womb as well as Tom Hoefling's and decide in your heart which one of the two candidates is truly pro life.


http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Profiles/Governor/Massachusetts/Mitt_Romney/Views/Abortion/

ROMNEY: Let me tell you what my orientation would be, which is I would like to appoint to the Supreme Court justices who believe in following the constitution as opposed to legislating from the bench.
I would like to see that Supreme Court return to the states the responsibility to determining laws related to abortion, as opposed to having the federal Supreme Court from the bench telling America and all the states how they have to do it. I think that's the appropriate course.
Now, is there a constitutional path to have the Congress say we're going to push aside the decision of the Supreme Court and we instead are going to step forward and return to the states this power or put in place our own views on abortion.
That would create obviously a constitutional crisis. Could that happen in this country? Could there be circumstances where that might occur? I think it's reasonable that something of that nature might happen someday. That's not something I would precipitate.
What I would look to do would be appoint people to the Supreme Court that will follow strictly the constitution as opposed to legislating from the bench. I believe that we must be a nation of laws.
Our message to EVERY officer of government in America:

KEEP YOUR OATH!

IT'S NOT OPTIONAL!
Picture
 

Is an unborn child a person? Of course.

Which is why we MUST abolish abortion in this country NOW.

America's founders clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence that the equal protection of the God-given, unalienable right to life of every person is the primary reason for the existence of government.

And, the ultimate purpose of our Constitution is to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity."

Two of the Amendments to that precious document spell out unmistakably what is required of every officer of government, at every level, and in every branch:

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The equal protection of every innocent person within the United States is NOT optional. IT IS IMPERATIVE.

That's why We the People DEMAND that ALL officers of government, in EVERY branch, and at EVERY level, keep their oath to defend the unalienable, God-given right to life of EVERY innocent person, FROM CREATION UNTIL NATURAL DEATH.

The practices of abortion and euthanasia should not exist in a republic whose form of government, and law, and claim to liberty is premised on the foundation of the equal protection of unalienable, God-given natural individual rights.


If our elected representatives, and the officers of government they appoint, will not keep their sacred oaths of office to protect the God-given rights of all the people, we intend to replace them with those who will.

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound  by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution..."

-- Article VI, the United States Constitution

"...so, help me God."

-- George Washington, upon the completion of the taking of the oath of office which is required by our Constitution
Picture
 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men..."

-- The Declaration of Independence

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

-- The Preamble, or Statement of Purpose, of the United States Constitution

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

-- The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

-- The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution


"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a 'person' within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses,  for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment."

-- Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Roe vs. Wade, 1973

"You shall not murder."

-- Exodus 20:13

"God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever." 

-- Thomas Jefferson

Sign the Resolution today!


This website provided free of charge by Tom Hoefling, in exercise of his God-given, unalienable right to free political speech and freedom of the press, as guaranteed by the protections of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

published Is Pro Life With Exceptions Pro Abortion? in Forum 2012-10-31 01:35:29 -0400

Is Pro Life With Exceptions Pro Abortion?

Dear Mr. Santorum,

My understanding is that you are pro life without exceptions. If that is your position, why have you decided to endorse a presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, who is pro-life with exceptions (except rape, incest or endangerment of the mother's health - Isn't a pro life with exceptions position still a pro abortion position?). Mr. Romney has also stated publicly at http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Profiles/Governor/Massachusetts/Mitt_Romney/Views/Abortion/ "I would like to see that Supreme Court return to the states the responsibility to determining laws related to abortion, as opposed to having the federal Supreme Court from the bench telling America and all the states how they have to do it. I think that's the appropriate course." Does that sound like a president who would take an active role in stopping abortions? Why not, instead. publicly endorse a presidential candidate, Tom Hoefling, and a vice-presidential candidate, Jonathan Ellis, of America's Party who, like you, are pro life without exceptions and are determined to do everything in their vested power as president and vice-president of the United States to stop abortions?

I would like to add to this posting, as a PS below, an eloquent endorsement for Tom Hoefling's candidacy posted at http://www.madashecc.com/2012/09/23/i-endorse-tom-hoefling-for-president/ which I agree with. You will note that this individual supported you and voted for you in the primary for that same reason, namely, that you are pro life without exceptions.

On this basis, in these remaining days before November 6th, I am asking you to please reconsider your public endorsement of Mitt Romney and instead publicly support the candidacy of Tom Hoefling and Jonathan Ellis for president and vice-president of the United States in this 2012 election.

Thank you for your kind attention and consideration.

Sincerely Yours,

Larry DeMejo (a New York state voter endorsing Tom Hoefling and Jonathan Ellis for president and vice-president of the United States in 2012)

PS   I Endorse Tom Hoefling for President

I have been saying for a few weeks now that a full written endorsement for Tom Hoefling of America’s party was in the works.
I already knew I was going to vote for Tom a few months ago but I had been so caught up in the Romney drama that I didn’t stop to consider that rather than trying to convince people how bad Romney is, I may do better to convince people how good Tom is.
In thinking about how I would construct this endorsement I wanted to make sure that I made it about Tom and not Romney; about a values based candidate who deserves the votes of principled conservatives who believe that good can conquer evil, not about chastising those who aren’t principled and choose to believe that only a lesser evil can defeat evil.
In church this morning my Pastor spoke of 5 things to get through stressful circumstances.
1. Trust that God is holy and good
2. Trust in his promises
3. Stop trying to be in control
4. Open your eyes in your circumstances
5. Embrace freedom while you walk through
Of these, the one that spoke to me most was stop trying to be in control. He spoke of those three Hebrew boys in the fiery furnace (the story that keeps confirming my decision to support Tom). He talked about how they knew their God was holy and good and in control, and they said “we will not bow”.
He spoke of how we need to understand that we don’t control the government. God raises governments and he tears them down, what our focus should be on is fellowship with him and when we focus on his goodness we walk in faith. When we walk in faith we can walk around in a fiery furnace like it’s a day on the beach.
Tom Hoefling is a humble man who loves this country. He is the underdog of all underdogs and yet is willing to step out in faith because he believes that God is indeed Holy and good. That goodness of God is what directed the paths of those brave men who founded this country and the freedoms that we have come to take for granted. Tom still believes in that message because he believes that God’s goodness does not fade away.
Tom is standing in front of a powerful King and telling him “I will not bow”. In hearing Tom speak a few times I believe that he is answering a calling. He may not be called to win but he is certainly called to take a stand that no one else is taking.
He is standing for God’s goodness.
One thing that is always a huge factor to me in supporting a candidate is abortion. Abortion is the biggest most heinous atrocity that happened to this nation in its history. I hold it even more atrocious than slavery because at least slaves were allowed to live!! Abortion is closer to the sick actions of Hitler.
I cannot even find words in the English language to express my disgust with a nation that would approve of murdering its most innocent and helpless citizens. It’s mind boggling and excruciatingly painful to think about.
Tom is the only true pro-life candidate on my ballot. What do I mean by that? Well, when Tom says he believes in the sanctity of life, he means it. He doesn’t believe we can pick and choose which people deserve to be protected under the law. A heartbeat is a heartbeat, a life is a life and it is worthy of protection no matter how it came to existence.
Tom understands the threat of Iran and our duty as America to protect our allies and not appease those who would seek to destroy us.
Tom understands that government has limitations, that politicians are public servants entrusted with a duty to protect people, not rule over them.
Tom respects our Constitution and would uphold the vow to follow it’s direction and serve the nation under it’s guidelines.
I’m voting for Tom Hoefling for president for the same reason I voted for Rick Santorum in my primary. Because despite the odds against him, despite the voices that say he can’t win, I’m letting God have control.
God asked me to trust him, he asked me to have faith, he embedded in my spirit with the first breath of life that entered my body, a part of him. The part of me that moralizes and holds on to the values that keep me close to him, those same values brought me to support Rick Santorum, a man who fought for the unborn, a man who believes in the Constitution and has respect for America’s exceptional history of freedom that no other country has ever been able to experience.
Those same values bring me to support Tom Hoefling. No matter if it’s the primary or the general election I will always vote my values. My values will never allow me to vote for a lesser evil.
My God is good and holy. My God is in control. I trust his promises. My eyes are open to see his presence. And with a vote for my conscience I embrace freedom.
Tom Hoefling America’s Party
God’s candidate
2012
www.tomhoefling.com